Comments on: “Edgy” is crap http://www.tinygigantic.com/2007/02/26/edgy-is-crap/ An inspration feed updated daily by the troublemakers at Language in Common Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:47:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: josh kamler http://www.tinygigantic.com/2007/02/26/edgy-is-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-574 josh kamler Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:03:05 +0000 http://www.tinygigantic.com/2007/02/26/edgy-is-crap/#comment-574 Andrew: Hells yes. Mutual involvement in projects of any kind should be the rule, not the exception. Andrew: Hells yes. Mutual involvement in projects of any kind should be the rule, not the exception.

]]> By: Andrew http://www.tinygigantic.com/2007/02/26/edgy-is-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-556 Andrew Thu, 29 Mar 2007 06:26:01 +0000 http://www.tinygigantic.com/2007/02/26/edgy-is-crap/#comment-556 Great stuff! I totally agree. "edgy" can mean so many things, that it's hard to conceptualize what a client may mean by it. Getting a cool concept down can take forever and a day, and it's super tough churning out concepts like it grows on trees. What I've found that really helped on design projects (used to be a designer way back) is to get the client mutually involved in the project. It really moved the process a whole lot better! Great blog! Great stuff! I totally agree.

“edgy” can mean so many things, that it’s hard to conceptualize what a client may mean by it. Getting a cool concept down can take forever and a day, and it’s super tough churning out concepts like it grows on trees.

What I’ve found that really helped on design projects (used to be a designer way back) is to get the client mutually involved in the project. It really moved the process a whole lot better!

Great blog!

]]>